Is protection on SpaceX cheap or dear today, where has the money been placed, how did the past month play out, and how did the judgments we filed on SpaceX settle? Updated after every close, with right and wrong judgments alike left on the record.
Data date 10.07 · close 168.18 (—) · −25.47% from the 52-week high
I
Where it stands today
One-year IV percentile28 / 100
Where one-month protection (30-day implied volatility) sits within its past-year range, 0 the cheapest and 100 the dearest. Protection on SpaceX is now in the cheaper part of the past year.
30-day / one-year implied vol (%)48.76 / 50.94
The one-year sits 2.18 points above the 30-day, the usual shape: a longer policy covers more.
Expected move this week±3.1% ±5.39
Centred on the previous close of 171.92, option prices imply 166.53 to 177.31 at this week's expiry. A close outside it at expiry means the option sellers lose.
Put ÷ call (volume / open interest)0.69 / 1.15
Calls outtraded puts. It counts contracts, not direction: a put buyer may be insuring shares they own.
Levels from high to low, with distance from the close:
Call wall
180
+7.03%
The strike with the most call open interest: an upside target someone has already made a down payment on.
Expected move, high
177.31
+5.43%
Centred on the previous close: the implied top at this week's expiry.
Close
168.18
Expected move, low
166.53
−0.98%
Centred on the previous close: the implied bottom at this week's expiry.
The strike with the most put open interest: protection someone already paid for.
Data date 10.07. Updated once after each trading day's close; spot is the official close.
II
The last 30 trading days
Close, flip level, put wall and call wall, day by day: which side of the walls price is on, and whether the walls moved.
One-year and 30-day implied vol, day by day. The short line jumping while the long line holds means only the near-term event is being repriced; the long line rising too means the whole story is.
Shown: the last 30 trading days. Earlier records are in Chapter V (walls) and Chapter VII (implied vol) of the options page.
III
Today's big prints
Today SpaceX calls traded $26.4M in premium and puts $12.4M. Traded, not bought: we cannot see who bought and who sold.
Expiry
Strike
Type
Volume
OI
Premium traded
Attribution
10.16
160
Call
12683
32964
$12.8M
Inconclusive: volume below OI, may be churn
A-grade rows only, each rechecked. Attribution is arithmetic: volume at least twice OI reads likely new; above OI, leans new; below OI, inconclusive.
Each judgment is written down with its test before the fact, settled by that test, and left standing when wrong. These are all the cases that name SpaceX, none removed. Open one for the original filing.
5cases since 07.22
5settled
0open
09.18Witching-day bets on a fall lostAlso: SPY, TSLA, MSTR, SNDKundetermined
Settlement undetermined
Original filing and test, archived verbatim in Chinese
09.17SpaceX: 60 thousand contracts bet on above 155 for tomorrow expiry while someone paid today for below 155 within a month with 39 thousand new at-the-m…partly confirmed
Settlement partly confirmed
Original filing and test, archived verbatim in Chinese
08.17The term-structure inversions in AVGO and SPCX have different originsAlso: AVGOPartly
Settlement Partly. The SPCX half fails: the test triggered cleanly — the inversion went from +0.66 on 08-17 to -0.84 on 08-18, i.e. it was taken back, so under the filing's own terms 08-17 counts as a single point. The AVGO half is not determinable: the weakening condition presupposed that the underlying stops falling, and that never happened before settlement — AVGO fell 3.17% on 08-18 and 4.61% on 08-19, so the condition never had a chance to trigger (the inversion ran 1.38, 1.44, 1.13 through that window).
Original filing and test, archived verbatim in Chinese
08.07An 08-14 three-strike call ladder together with the 119P at 5.90x means new positions were opened on the call and put side at the same timeNot determinable
Settlement Not determinable.
Original filing and test, archived verbatim in Chinese
How to read this page
· The one-year percentile and the 30-day and one-year implied vols come from two different sources; each is compared only with its own past, and the two are never spliced together.
· The 30-day and one-year vols are constant-maturity: interpolated between the two nearest expiries to exactly 30 and 365 days, read once before each close.
· A big-print row is one contract's full-day total, not a single trade. Without per-trade timestamps or aggressor side we state premium traded only.
· Every reading is cross-checked against two independent sources and updated once after the close. Raw data is not provided on this site.
· Data and information only; not investment advice; no buy or sell recommendations.