Is protection on XLF cheap or dear today, where has the money been placed, how did the past month play out, and how did the judgments we filed on XLF settle? Updated after every close, with right and wrong judgments alike left on the record.
Data date 10.07 · close 53.96 (—) · −7.91% from the 52-week high
I
Where it stands today
One-year IV percentile61 / 100
Where one-month protection (30-day implied volatility) sits within its past-year range, 0 the cheapest and 100 the dearest. Protection on XLF is now in the pricier part of the past year.
30-day / one-year implied vol (%)17.33 / 19.58
The one-year sits 2.25 points above the 30-day, the usual shape: a longer policy covers more.
Expected move this week±1.1% ±0.58
Centred on the previous close of 54.01, option prices imply 53.43 to 54.59 at this week's expiry. A close outside it at expiry means the option sellers lose.
Put ÷ call (volume / open interest)0.66 / 1.46
Calls outtraded puts. It counts contracts, not direction: a put buyer may be insuring shares they own.
Levels from high to low, with distance from the close:
The strike with the most call open interest: an upside target someone has already made a down payment on.
Expected move, high
54.59
+1.16%
Centred on the previous close: the implied top at this week's expiry.
Put wall
54
+0.07%
The strike with the most put open interest: protection someone already paid for.
Close
53.96
Expected move, low
53.43
−0.98%
Centred on the previous close: the implied bottom at this week's expiry.
Data date 10.07. Updated once after each trading day's close; spot is the official close.
II
The last 30 trading days
Close, flip level, put wall and call wall, day by day: which side of the walls price is on, and whether the walls moved.
One-year and 30-day implied vol, day by day. The short line jumping while the long line holds means only the near-term event is being repriced; the long line rising too means the whole story is.
Shown: the last 30 trading days. Earlier records are in Chapter V (walls) and Chapter VII (implied vol) of the options page.
Each judgment is written down with its test before the fact, settled by that test, and left standing when wrong. These are all the cases that name XLF, none removed. Open one for the original filing.
4cases since 09.17
4settled
0open
09.25The rate shock lands on regional banks first, tech laterAlso: KREHolds, right at the line
Settlement Holds, right at the line: at 15:47 on October 2 one-month insurance on the regional bank fund was 27.47 against 27.26 for one year, only 0.21 above (0.73 on October 1). To be plain: by the original wording the call should have been withdrawn on September 28, when one-month dipped below one-year (25.95 against 26.40); the settlement was then moved to October 2 and a one-day touch was not counted, as disclosed in the issue.
Original filing and test, archived verbatim in Chinese
09.18Stocks price the hike as an event and bonds as three or four moreAlso: GS, JPM, BAC, C, WFCWithdrawn
Settlement Withdrawn: Goldman one-year implied vol fell from 36.15 to 33.52, through the 34.14 line; the other layers got dearer while bank insurance stayed flat.
Original filing and test, archived verbatim in Chinese
How to read this page
· The one-year percentile and the 30-day and one-year implied vols come from two different sources; each is compared only with its own past, and the two are never spliced together.
· The 30-day and one-year vols are constant-maturity: interpolated between the two nearest expiries to exactly 30 and 365 days, read once before each close.
· A big-print row is one contract's full-day total, not a single trade. Without per-trade timestamps or aggressor side we state premium traded only.
· Every reading is cross-checked against two independent sources and updated once after the close. Raw data is not provided on this site.
· Data and information only; not investment advice; no buy or sell recommendations.